Posted in Pre-launch, Spot Us News by Digidave on July 14th, 2008

Proof of Concept – Coming Up!

We raised $250 in 10 days to support a journalist. Here’s How You Can Do The Same.

On July 3rd I announced that Spot.Us created a wiki that could accomplish our basic goals: The wiki would allow groups of people to come together around topics, journalists could create pitches and using a 3rd party e-commerce solution, we could crowdfund.

Two weeks later, we have successfully raised enough money for our first example of “community funded reporting.” You can duplicate this. I’ve used no secret technology. Whenever it comes to online organizing – it’s more about the people than the technology. What’s holding you back?

A note about this first example: I don’t want to sell this as outright “success.” That’s not what Spot Us is about at this stage (pulling something off and shouting “success”). The analogy I like to use: This is like a pitcher getting ready in the bull pen. We are warming up. This was our first practice throw. To extend that analogy our first practice “pitch” made it safely into the hands of a catcher. We are one-for-one in our warm up pitches. Considering this is very new territory, I am thrilled about successfully going through the motions.

The ingredients

(a: Fantastic reporter. The reporter in this case is Alexis Madrigal. I first met Alexis while working on the Beat Blogging project. He is a young and motivated reporter, but also seasoned, as he regularly reports for Wired. An ideal reporter, in my opinion, will help with fundraising by spreading the word similar to how Chris Albritton asked his readers for financial support to report from Iraq. Alexis did this via Twitter, but more importantly (and I’ll discuss this more below) Alexis believes in this story. That’s why he asked for, what we both agree, is below market value. As one donor noted “250 is cheap.” That’s because Alexis has wanted to do this story for some time.

(b. Fundraiser: Sisi and I both spent a decent amount of time “fundraising” which I’ll describe below in “the strategy.”

(c. Participants: We got 13 contributors who donated an average of $20 each. Some gave $25 others gave $10. Some of the donations came from people I know and indeed I donated $15 myself. More on this in “what went wrong” below.

The Strategy

1. To get started all we needed was ingredient A and B from above. If you are A, nothing will stop you from being B as well, although it helps to have someone else in your corner.

2. Find news or civic organizations that might be interested in the final product. In this case Sisi and I targeted environmental blogs. We contacted 15 and four of them responded including EcoGeek and EcoLocalizer. The later even donated $25 themselves. What’s in it for them? Quality content they wouldn’t be able to afford otherwise which will now be handed to them via a Creative Commons license.

3. Personal interactions and networks. Most people don’t respond well to blanket calls to donate. At least – not that I know of. Example: Several people bookmarked the Eco-localizer post on Stumbleupon but didn’t donate. Following up with them personally did result in one donation.

What went absolutely right!

1. Step two above worked. Four out of 16 blogs put out a call to help spread the word for us. The reason, I believe, is because they see the value in a creative commons investigation. This is the kind of reporting that they wouldn’t be able to purchase on their own – most blogs don’t have a freelance budget where they can throw $250 at a story. But this is about maturing the blogosphere – allowing people to collaborate together on stories. It’s possible that I could have just contacted the blogs and asked for $10 each and given them all first publishing rights and not even dealt with micro-donations from readers. Instead it would have been about micro-publishers. That might be a future approach.

What Needs to be Improved (or isn’t up to par)

1. We didn’t raise THAT much money. I envision some investigative reporting projects requiring 2k or more. We raised $250 in 10 days. That’s great, but it was also because of Alexis’ generosity that the target was so low. I do not expect to know so many generous people and indeed, Spot Us is not about forcing reporters to be generous. For now, I am thankful.

2. I love my network, but Spot.us can’t rely on them for donations. There was one anonymous donation of $25 which was to “just getting the ball rolling and providing David Cohn some support for his excellent idea.”

It’s obviously greatly appreciated, but in the end Spot.Us has to stand on its own two feet. While “I get by with a little help from my friends,” I wish I knew who Anonymous was. I also noted donations from Michele McLellan, Josh Levy and Ellen Miller. While I do know all three, I suspect the donations weren’t just to support me. That would be an egotistical view anyways. I could see all three having an earnest interest in the outcomes of Alexis’ research. This is especially true for Levy, who is heading up Change.org’s editorial direction and Ellen Miller who is always interested in potential government oversight.

3. This pitch isn’t “hyperlocal.”

A requirement from Knight Foundation is that Spot Us support local journalism. This is local to California, but not “hyper-local.” This was the first pitch on the wiki and within two hours already raised $50.
By time I realized it wasn’t hyper-local to the Bay Area, it already had momentum. It’s also a great pitch. So instead of killing it because it wasn’t hyper-local enough, I chose to run with it. This will not be the case in the future. From here on out: I’m all about the SF Bay (it’s where I left my heart).

What now?

Two things.

1. To go back to the bull pen “pitcher” analogy. The catcher (reporter) has to return the ball back to the pitcher. Don’t forget – we have only gone through half the motions. Now Alexis has some reporting to do.

2. Wind up and get ready to throw another practice pitch (I know another reporter who is drafting one as I type).

Related posts:

  1. Alexis Madrigal Is Doing "Spot Reporting"
  2. This is How Spot Reporting Works
  3. Campaign Season is Coming – And With It, Propaganda
  4. Growing a Community and The Importance of Being Iterative
  5. Video Update on Spot Us

10 Responses to 'Proof of Concept – Coming Up!'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Proof of Concept – Coming Up!'.

  1. Andrew said, on July 14th, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    David, congrats on your first funded project. One thing occurred to me while reading this post – the identity of the funders. I’m wondering if it might be best that future story funders remain completely anonymous (maybe even from Spot.Us as well). Part of what intrigues me about Spot.Us is that it could keep corporate or political bias from influencing the reporting. Posting the names of individual donors (and their affiliation) might make it more difficult for Spot.Us or the journalist to claim objectivity. Just a knee-jerk thought after reading this post.

  2. Digidave said, on July 14th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    Andrew
    Excellent question and in fact, it is something I’ve thought about.

    It could work too – it’s almost a reverse transparency issue. Instead of forcing transparency – we will force anonymity so the money can’t influence anything.

    Bottom line: There is no such thing as “clean money.” I don’t think making the donation anonymous will make things clean. I think making things transparent will at least allow the readers to make their own decision.

    Also: because we solicit small donations (there is a cap on how much people can donate), there is the hope that bias’ from one direction or the other will cancel each other out.

    But by no means is this figured out 100%. That’s just my approach right now. You may very well have hit on an issue/solution that spot.us will have to take one day.

    But here’s a counter-situation to what you just tweeted me: “Hypothetical: Would Spot.Us take a hefty donation from an ethanol company to help write a story about ethanol?”

    What if a clothing company wanted to give a donation to the Ethanol story? They have no stake in it – what they want is to publicly give back to civic society (and get good PR for it). That money isn’t “dirty” at all and all that’s needed to solicit it is to give the clothing company recognition for giving back.

    Just another scenario.

    Best

  3. Daniel Bachhuber said, on July 14th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    I’m interested in how this concept might apply to college journalism. If you think the big newspapers are being hit hard by the digital revolution, you should take a look at the college newspapers. Not many people are optimistic at this point. Have you considered how the might fit in the picture?

    Also, I agree with you, Dave, on the issue of transparency. Transparency is about openness and, if only one type of story is being published, we’ll at least be able to see who is so gung-ho about getting that story out.

  4. Digidave said, on July 14th, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    @Daniel
    I’ll be honest – I haven’t put a LOT of thought about how universities might use it for their paper.

    But I have thought about how J-students might use it to build up their portfolio while getting paid at the same time.

    Since work is licensed under Creative Commons, any work they do could be published on their college newspaper, but the newspaper would have to realize that they won’t get a “scoop” – they will be publishing something that might also appear elsewhere. Still – that’s a lesson in the economics of content.

  5. Jason Preston said, on July 14th, 2008 at 3:19 pm

    Congrats on the proof of concept, David. Like you said, for a first go-through-the-motions pitch, this is a great success.

    I think Spot Us is working on a great concept, and one that will likely resonate with the public, not unlike Obama’s fund raising has.

    One of the things I’m curious to see as the project moves forward, is where your donations come from. It will be interesting to see if they track to hyper-local sources, or if you get regular donors from Milwaukee.

  6. Andrew said, on July 15th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    Does Spot.Us have a plan for making sure reporters don’t have a conflict of interest with the stories they work on? Saw this article today which prompted my question: http://tinyurl.com/644bvq

  7. Digidave said, on July 15th, 2008 at 4:39 pm

    @Andrew
    At this stage: me.
    Later on: Every story gets an independent quality assurance editor who receives 10% of the money donated. Their ONLY job is to fact-check and to ensure fairness.

  8. Brian said, on July 15th, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    Congrats on your success! There’s a site out there that does crowdfunding for filmmakers called IndieGoGo. Filmmakers can post their projects online and try to get money for them.

    The site uses the same ingredients that you have used in funding your project.

    Check it out: http://www.indiegogo.com

  9. [...] el blog de Spot.us, David hace un repaso muy completo a este caso concreto: qué ha funcionado, qué no, y qué hay que mejorar para el siguiente. Dentro de lo que ha [...]

  10. [...] and Spot Reporting Digidave 9:54 am On Monday we announced the first successful pitch on Spot Us. But, to be honest, we are only halfway there. We raised the money for a reporter (and [...]

Leave a Reply